Protected disclosure (whistleblowing), where the Claimant raised concerns about health and safety, transparency and governance failures and was subsequently subjected to adverse treatment culminating in her dismissal, the dismissal being contrary to section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Automatic unfair dismissal, arising directly from the Claimant’s protected disclosures and her refusal to compromise her ethical and professional duties, contrary to section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Harassment contrary to sections 26 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010, said to have occurred as a result of raising protected matters and acting consistently with her philosophical belief.
Discrimination because of religion or belief, namely the Claimant’s philosophical belief in, and adherence to, the principles of social and environmental justice, and the extent to which those principles informed her actions and decision-making, contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
Direct sex discrimination, contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, arising from the Respondent’s failure to maintain the protection and support previously provided by the Claimant’s line manager when that manager went on maternity leave.
Disability discrimination, including direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and failure to make reasonable adjustments, contrary to sections 13, 15 and 20–21 of the Equality Act 2010, the disability being her neurodivergence, namely ADHD and Asperger’s.
www.BeingVigilant.com